Genetically Modified Chickens That Do Not Spread Avian Flu

I have always marveled at how some—generally on the Left or among Greens—have little or no problem with human cloning and enhancements—with some notable exceptions, of course, such as Bill McGibben—but rail angrily against animal or grain modifications.  With that in mind, I wonder what they will think about scientists genetically modifying chickens so they don’t spread bird flu.  From the story:

A genetically modified ‘superchicken’ that doesn’t spread deadly bird flu has been developed by scientists. The bird is intended to prevent the outbreaks of avian influenza which lead to millions of birds being culled. It could also stop new strains of flu mutating in domestic fowl and spreading to people, leading to killer worldwide pandemics.

The British team behind the GM chicken say it is ‘inconceivable’ that its meat or eggs could be harmful. However, it will need rigorous safety checks before it could go into the food chain, they said. But anti GM campaigners warned that genetic engineering was not the answer to stopping bird flu – and said the public would never accept GM eggs and meat.

The aroused few might not, but most of us will, once those necessary safety tests have been conducted.   Moreover, the need to do this is apparent:

Avian flu is a serious threat to farmers and people. Although it does not easily infect humans, when it does it can be deadly. The latest, most virulent strain – called H5N1 – has killed more than 300 people since 2003 in 15 countries and led to the deaths of millions of birds. In 2007 around 260,000 turkeys were culled in East Anglia after outbreaks of H5N1. Doctors fear it could mutate in flocks of chickens into a new strain that is transmissible from person to person,  fuelling a pandemic that kills millions of people.

Animal and food ag (e.g. golden rice) GM can be very beneficial to humans and I support its use, within proper safety parameters (but not the precautionary principle).  Keeping chickens from spreading bird flu seem to me to be one such proper use.  Indeed, we modify species through selective breeding.  Why not properly applied genetic modification?

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…