At Wesleyan University, that’s the solution to the problem. There are only a few fraternities on or off campus, and fewer than a hundred students live in them, but they have been the object of allegations of sexual assault, and students and faculty have demanded that something be done. Wesleyan has decided to make them coed. As the story at insidehighered.com explains :
“The fraternities are recognized as ‘program housing’ at Wesleyan, which means that it’s official housing,” said Kate Carlisle, a university spokeswoman. “We have affinity for program houses for a wide variety of groups, including Russian House, Buddhist House, and Earth House. So, if a fraternity fails to comply with the policy change, they will no longer be recognized program housing. They’ll effectively be shut down.”
While the university did not officially tie the action to sexual assault, the head of the Student Assembly stated before the administration made its decision, “The culture of these houses contributes to the culture of sexual assault in a way we weren’t willing to stand for anymore.”
Making them coed, it is assumed, will change the culture and prevent further incidents.
That’s a telling strategy in that it opts to ignore college-male culture, the “guyland” American nineteen-year-old men inhabit, and instead simply break it down. That is, we shall not hold males to standards of gentlemanly conduct; we shall not regard exemplary masculinity as embodied by protecting women from male aggression. Rather, we shall use the presence of females to domesticate them.
One wonders, however, if the administrators realize whether the gender dynamic they envision will come about. Have they envisioned the scene in which a couple of female members join in fraternity rush and vote on pledges behind closed doors with the others?
Or, what if girls entering the frats have a different agenda than the advocates? Will they consider it a way to get popular or find boyfriends? Will it become a form of status competition on campus?
And as for the males, will they vote on which women to admit? Will they be allowed to apply nineteen-year-old male criteria to nineteen-year-old females? I can imagine a nighttime meeting of the brothers, with beer flowing and cigars smoking as they review the six applicants who want to become sisters. It’s not a conversation that will please President Michael Roth.
Image from Wikimedia Commons
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
