A French doctor was convicted of euthanizing a cancer patient. Good. According to the BBC report, she was given a suspended sentence, after stating that she decided to resort to a lethal injection after Druais had told her that she did not want to die “in filth” the French news agency AFP reported. But proper medical care does not permit dying to die “in filth.” Didn’t the good doctor assure her patient of this?
Such taps on the wrist are not good. There should be some real consequences for acts of this kind, even if based on a motive to alleviate suffering. Suicidal patients should have their concerns addressed. They should be assured that their pain will be alleviated and that they are not burdens. They should not be killed.
Worse, French politicians are beginning to speak about legalizing euthanasia. Now, there may be some confusion about what that means. In Europe, removing unwanted life support is sometimes called euthanasia—as in a recent Italian controversy. But this ignorant quote from the conservative candidate for President reveals the extent to which the people and leaders of France need to be educated about end of life care. From the story: Nicolas Sarkozy, the candidate for the ruling conservative party, suggested he might favor a law permitting euthanasia, saying recently: “Faced with suffering, we can’t just sit there doing nothing.”
Well, of course not! Hospice and other forms of palliative interventions—when properly provided—alleviate tremendous suffering. Even in cases such as AIDS. I remember interviewing one of the doctors at St. Christopher’s Hospice in London. Out of 1700 AIDS patients they cared for (by that time, which was several years ago), only 2 had asked for suicide and they changed their minds when proper interventions were applied.
If the media spent half as much time highlighting the tremendous opportunities to alleviate suffering through ethical medical means rather than repeatedly highlighting killing as an acceptable answer to the problem of human suffering, it would be better for all of humanity.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
