Ackerman points to an intriguing phenomenological difference between our dependence on air and our dependence on food. We breathe involuntarily; if we try to suffocate ourselves, we will pass out before we die, and we’ll begin breathing again. But (under normal circumstances) we don’t get food unless we seek it out, prepare it, put it in our mouths, chew and swallow. Ackerman is discussing taste, and pointing out the necessity of taste and the necessity of tastiness in food: If food were as tasteless as air, would we make the effort to eat?
As I say, this is intriguing phenomenologically, and perhaps has some profound theological depth to it: Jesus, the Son is food, while the Spirit is breath. The Word is “bread” without which we cannot live; but the breath of God also gives life, though in a different way. Perhaps exploring the phenomenology of food and air would lead us to deeper Trinitarian insight.
Where we go from here is anybody’s guess.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
