You all knew it was just a matter of time, didn’t you? Yes, some ethicists have said that it is morally wrong to decapitate flowers and appear to have opined there is something of a right to life for plants. From the story:
PLANTS deserve respect, a group of Swiss experts says, arguing that killing them arbitrarily is morally wrong— except when it comes to saving humans or maybe picking petals off a daisy. In a report on “the dignity of the creature in the plant world”, the federal Ethics Committee on non-human Gene Technology condemned the decapitation of flowers without reason, among other sins.
Still, commission member Bernard Baertsche suggested the body weighed such cruel acts on a case by case basis, noting “the simple pleasure of picking the petals off a daisy might suffice as a reason”.
Similarly “all action that involves plants in the aim to conserve the human species is morally justified,” the commission, tasked to offer an ethical take on all areas of biotechnology and genetic engineering, said in its report. Nor did the commission object to genetic engineering, since this did not threaten plants’ “autonomy—that is their capacity to reproduce or their capacity of adaptation”.
And only a minority of the group’s members objected to patenting plants, with the majority ruling the action did not infringe on “their moral value”.
There must be more to this than the story depicts. But really, plant “autonomy?”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
