I just went to Senators Orin Hatch and Dianne Feinstein’s Web sites to read their press releases on the introduction of S. 812, a bill that would legalize human cloning and authorize researchers to pay women to undergo egg procurement. Here, in part, is what both releases state:
The Human Cloning Ban and Stem Cell Protection Act of 2007 would allow stem cell research—known as somatic cell nuclear transplantation—to proceed under strict oversight from the federal government. However, the bill would draw a distinct line between this promising research and human reproductive cloning, which it bans outright.
Where does one begin? Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer is not embryonic stem cell research. Rather SCNT is a method of creating mammalian life “asexually,” that is, it creates a cloned embryo. One potential use for an embryo created through SCNT is embryonic stem cell research, but it is certainly not the only use. Indeed, proving that SCNT is not the same thing as stem cell research, as I wrote about yesterday, the bill would outlaw the implantion of the “product of SCNT” into a uterus. The perceived necessity to ban implantation proves my point that the “product of SCNT” are not stem cells: They are embryos. Stem cells could be implanted into billions of women for hundreds of years and not one pregnancy would result. But implant the “product of SCNT”, and a pregnancy could well result.
And here’s another bit of mendacity from both releases, which states that the bill would only:
Allow this stem cell research only to take place on unfertilized eggs.
But the bill itself refers to the “product of SCNT” as an “unfertilized blastocyst.” A blastocyst is the name given an embryo at about the one week stage of development. It is not an unfertilized egg, which is a single cell, an oocyte, also known as a gamete.
Either Dianne Feinstein and Orin Hatch do not know what they are legislating about or they don’t care about honestly communicating with their constituents about what they are legislating about. Either way, it does not speak well of Senators Dianne Feinstein and Orin Hatch.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
