Father’s Day Celebrates a Great Thing

Which is to say, not just fathers but fathers married to the mothers of their children. Those who insist Americans should approve, or at least not worry about, the growing number of what are somewhat euphemistically called non-traditional families “conveniently ignore, or are in complete denial about, the most fundamental consequence of the American retreat from marriage: growing rates of fatherless families,” writes the sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox in   Happy Fatherless Day . This is a bad thing

because marriage is the institution that binds men to their children. There is no substitute . . . . That’s in large part because, without marriage (and the economic, legal, and cultural supports that stand behind a strong marriage culture), these men [fathers not married to the mothers of their children] cannot maintain a good relationship with the mothers of their children, mothers who still, even today, serve as the primary caretakers and gatekeepers to their children.

Wilcox, a professor at the University of Virginia and head of the National Marriage Project, and also a friend of the magazine’s, spells out the benefits to children of having a father in The Distinct, Positive Impact of a Good Dad , published on The Atlantic ‘s site. Fathers make at least four “gendered” contributions to their children’s lives, meaning contributions apparently natural to fathers but not so much to mothers. They are, for example, “more likely to encourage their children to take risks, embrace challenges, and be independent, whereas mothers are more likely to focus on their children’s safety and emotional well-being.”

In Daddy’s Home , published by Slate , Wilcox explains what being a father at home with his children and their mother does for the men themselves. They are, for one thing, less likely to be depressed and for another less likely to be poor.

This is not, of course, what the currently dominant cultural narrative tells us. But fortunately, Wilcox and his peers are here to provide the evidence against it, and to their credit, outlets like  The Atlantic and Slate are willing to publish it. Readers will want to read his  Gender and Parenthood: Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives , which he edited with Kathleen Kovner Kline.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…