The notion that the Constitution has to grow with the nation is often seen as an innovation of the twentieth century. Yet, similar arguments were being aired early in the 19th century.
Henry Clay, erstwhile ally of Jefferson and Madison, stated a form of “National Republicanism” that sounded a lot like Hamiltonian Federalism with a populist slant. “A new world has come into being since the Constitution was adopted,” Clay argued during a Congressional debate in the 1820s, “Are the narrow, limited necessities of the ol thirteen states . . . as they existed at the formation of the present Constitution, forever to remain a rule of its interpretation? Are we to forget the wants of our country?”
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…