Eucharistic polity

Muir again: “In [medieval] England taking communion was called ‘taking one’s rights,’ which meant asserting one’s membership in the community, and to suffer excommunication . . . would have meant exclusion from both the universal community of believers and the local community of citizens . . . . Although the ideal of social harmony conveyed in the communion rite may not have been achieved very often in the daily give and take of village life, the occasional ritual experience of utopia expressed a model for what society could be.”

The social effects of the eucharist were particularly marked in Italy, where “persons involved in a vendetta made peace, each recieved the Eucharist, celebrating their new collectivity as members of the body of Christ and publicly acknowledging that they put themselves in peril of the ‘vendetta of God’ were they to break the peace, a vendetta that might deprive them of the protection of community in this life as well as of salvation in the next.”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…