The L.A. Times’ Jacket Copy blog has compiled a list of sixty one essential postmodern reads . While they don’t define exactly what constitutes postmodern literature, they annotate the list with certain attributes: “the author is a character, fiction and reality are blurred, the text includes fictional artifacts, such as letters, lyrics, even whole other books, and so on.”
I’m not much of a fiction aficionado so I’m unfamiliar with most of the works. Of the ones I’ve read only one is a masterpiece (William Shakespeare’s Hamlet ), a few are quite good (Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis , Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried ), while the rest are a bit overrated (Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter , Art Spiegelman’s Maus I & III , Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five ). All of these, though, would be considered somewhat essential.
But what surprised me most is how many books on the list (fourteen) I’ve started but never finished: Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin , Roberto Bolaño’s 2666 , William S. Burroughs’ Naked Lunch , Mark Danielewski’s House of Leaves , Dave Eggers’ A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius , William Faulkner’s Absalom! Absalom! , Jonathan Safran Foer’s Everything Is Illuminated , Milan Kundera’s The Book of Laughter and Forgetting , Vladimir Nabokov’s Pale Fire , Harvey Pekar’s American Splendor , Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow , Laurence Stern’s The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy , David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest , and Colson Whitehead’s John Henry Days.
Like economist Tyler Cowen , “I start ten or so books for every one I finish. I don’t mind disliking a book, and I never regret having picked it up and started it. I am ruthless in my discards.” Yet seeing all of these discarded tomes on a list of essential reading makes me wonder if I’m missing something.
Which books on the list should I give a second chance and which are worth starting (and finishing)? What books should have been included on the list but are inexplicably missing (my primary candidates: Umberto Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum (loved it) and Cervantes’ Don Quioxte (bored me to tears)).
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…