No, says Milbank. But then he often sounds pantheistic, to his contemporaries as well as to us. How does Milbank defend him? Here’s what I think I’ve figured out:
1) God is transcendent, and this means (in Milbank’s Cusan theology) that He transcends oppositions; there is a “coincidence of opposites” in God.
2) Specifically, it means He transcends the opposition of difference/identity. If God were simply different from creatures, He would be another being on the same plane as other beings. To put it in quasi-Hegelian terms, if He were simply bounded by other beings, He would not be infinite but finite. So, we cannot simply say that God distinguishable from other creatures without taking away from His transcendence.
3) On the other hand, He is not simply “indistinct” or “identical” either. That would also rob Him of transcendence. As I understand Milbank’s deliberately paradoxical formulation, He is distinguishable precisely by being indistinguishable, different precisely in the fact that we cannot simply differentiate Him from creation. We can’t draw a line, point to one side and say, “here is God,” then point to the other side and say, “and here is not-God.” We can do that with finite, immanent creatures; not with the infinite transcendent God.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…