This isn’t a political blog, but by all appearances those who arrogantly forced Obamacare down the nation’s unwilling throat—remember Speaker Pelosi’s in your face march across Capitol Hill?—seem to face a stiff electoral price. Polls show that the public’s opposition is growing, almost half the states are in open rebellion, with lawsuits filed and efforts taken to opt out of the law, and those who pushed the law through the Congress are being urged by Democratic pollsters to run away from their signature “achievement.”
Now, a group of physicians—Docs 4 Patient Care, has opened a new front against the law, particularly its heavy bureaucratic footprint that will make health care less efficient and less individualized. (See the clip embedded above.) The group working energetically to promote repeal, including urging physicians to place a letter to patients in their waiting rooms. The group’s leader, Dr. Hal Scherz, wrote a recent opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, explaining why the organization is taking such startling and high profile action. From “Dear Patient: Vote to Repeal Obamacare,”:
The letter states in unambiguous language what the new law means:
“Dear Patient: Section 1311 of the new health care legislation gives the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services and her appointees the power to establish care guidelines that your doctor must abide by or face penalties and fines. In making doctors answerable in the federal bureaucracy this bill effectively makes them government employees and means that you and your doctor are no longer in charge of your health care decisions. This new law politicizes medicine and in my opinion destroys the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship that makes the American health care system the best in the world.”
This seems undeniable to me. I don’t know if Docs 4 Patient Care will succeed in getting a large number of physicians to publicly urge their patients to work against the law. But if the public comes to perceive that their doctors widely oppose Obamacare, it could spell doom to all but the most benign provisions of the law. I wish them luck in their advocacy efforts.
Repeal. Reform. Replace. Defund.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…