1 John 2:23 says that whoever denies the Son denies the Father as well, and vice versa – whoever confesses the Son confesses the Father. What’s the logic here? Is John assuming that Jesus is the mediator who makes a way to the Father, so that denying him closes off the way to the Father? Perhaps. But John might also, already, be employing a form of argument later found in Athanasius: If you deny the Son, then you deny that the Father is Father, since a Father must have a Son; if you confess the Son, then you confess the Father, since a Son must have a Father. Confession of Son and Father are thus strictly correlative – confession of either entails confession of both.
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…