Cryptic as always, Hamann writes ( Aesthetica in Nuce ): “Speak, that I might see you! — This desire was fulfilled in creation, which is an address to the creature through the creature.”
Dickson notes that this suggests that creation pre-exists itself such that its desire is answered by the act of creation. She explains: “I make sense of this logical puzzle by metaschematically applying a Lacanian notion: that even before it is born the baby already is given a role and identity in the structure of a family, has a place and unique position there (e.g. a woman carrying her first baby and planning to have several has already created an identity for her unborn child, not as her ‘only child’ but as an ‘elder sibling’ – though not only are there no other siblings, but the child itself has not even been born.”
Hamann’s use of this notion hints at a doctrine of the decree: “we had a ‘pre-existence’ in God’s structuring an identity for us (and creating our desire) as his children, even before the creation ‘from nothing.’”
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
The trouble with blogging …
The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…