Thomas defines sacraments in terms of their power to effect sanctification. Not all sacred signs are sacraments, but only those which are efficacious; they are signs of holy things that make men holy (ST 60, 2). Thomas also denies that sacraments were necessary in Eden, since there was no need to remedy sin (ST 61, 2).
With much of the Reformed tradition, I think Thomas is wrong about prelapsarian sacraments. But the reasons for affirming or denying prefall sacraments may have less to do with soteriology than eschatology. Does the belief in prefall sacraments rise and fall with belief in prefall eschatology, with the belief that Adam was destined to grow in perfection, from glory to greater glory?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
