Corruption of Science by Political Scientists Taking Its Toll

I have been warning that the politicization of science and the attempt to turn it into an ideology—even a religion—would badly undermine the public’s confidence.  Indeed, I warned that the outrageous stem cell hyping, the global warming hysteria, and the clear suppression of dissenting views by the Science Elite (as opposed to the hard working bench scientists), would ultimately result in science being perceived by the public as just another special interest fighting to feed at the public trough and to obtain power in order to enforce it’s ideological desires.

A recent Washington Post poll shows that is now happening, with distrust of scientists on environmental issues up in the last eighteen months or so from 30% to 40%, and soaring from April 07, when it was just 24%.  In fact, the “distrust” group has the plurality over trust completely/a lot (29%) and trust moderately (30%).  From the poll:

30. How much do you trust the things that scientists say about the environment – completely, a lot, a moderate amount, a little, or not at all?

           -------- Trust -------              ---- Do not trust ---
A Moderate A Not No
NET Completely lot amount NET little at all opinion
12/13/09 29 10 19 30 40 26 14 1
7/28/08 30 6 24 39 30 23 7 1
4/10/07 32 5 27 43 24 19 5 1
3/14/06 31 5 27 41 27 22 5 1

The media deserves its share of the blame for this. Instead of being journalists and forcing “the scientists” to prove their arguments, media were instead too often breathless shills and boosters.  In the end, that kind of malpractice hurts the group being pampered, because it doesn’t force them to play their best game.

It’s not too late to turn this around.  All the science sector need do is act like the science sector: Stop the hype, stop the suppression, open access to data, and stop being so political.  But that won’t happen. “The scientists” are very ideological.  And so the confidence of the public will continue to slowly wither away.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…