Cheney Waited For New Heart Like Everyone Else

I was happy to hear that former VP Dick Cheney successfully underwent heart transplant surgery. I was also very glad that he waited in line like everyone else—20 months.  The organ transplant triage system should not be a respecter of persons.  Every potential organ recipient, whether pauper, Steve Jobs (who legally gamed the system to obtain his liver more quickly), or the former Vice President of the United States, should be treated alike.

Some, however, are saying that Cheney’s age should have perhaps disqualified him.  But people his age do just fine with transplants.  From the WEB MD story:

The question is: how does someone in his 70s fare after such major surgery? Quite well, actually, and the latest research suggests that people over 70 do just as well as younger people after a heart transplant.

Moreover, Cheney was within current guidelines for receiving a new heart, and indeed, waited longer than the average patient. From the ABC story:

Some medical centers will not perform a heart transplant on patient over 65, but other major centers will perform transplants on patients who are as old as 72. In any case, transplants at Cheney’s age are not unheard of: Last year 332 heart transplants were performed on people over 65, and according to the United Network for Organ Sharing, 14 percent of recepients are over the age of 65. “Patients from 18 all the way up to 71 years old, are on the same national list and you’re listed on the basis of medical urgency and then how long you’ve been waiting,” said Dr. Jonathan Chen, an adjunct associate professor of surgery at Columbia University in New York.

I am not comfortable with rationing based on age.  If a 75-year-old has the stamina to benefit, why shouldn’t he or she be allowed in the line like everyone else?

In any event, regardless of our political persuasion, let’s lift a glass to the good health of the former vice president.  I am very pleased that when it came to a transplant, he was not given special treatment.  And three cheers to the anonymous donor who truly gave the gift of life.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…