The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) would be laughable if it weren’t so expensive and engaged in funding immoral research with borrowed money that I and every other Californian will have to pay back. The latest shinanigan was exposed by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, which found that the wholly publicly funded (again, using borrowed money) CIRM hired an outside PR firm to deal with a news story its leadership didn’t like. From the Foundation’s press release:
And there was a little money laundering going on: The CIRM had the law firm hire the PR firm, and then funneled the payments from CIRM to the PR firm through the law firm—classic money laundering that made the payment look like legal fees:Documents detailing the California stem cell institute’s involvement with a well-known “crisis management” public relations firm reveal an agency leadership worried about the state agency’s image and committed to keeping PR advice secret by channeling it through an outside law firm, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) said today.
The stem cell institute, a public body formed to spend taxpayer-approved funds on research, paid the PR agency with money funneled through the law firm, according to documents obtained by FTCR. The PR agency then apparently funneled its advice back through the law firm. The stem cell agency used the tactic to claim legal “confidentiality” on public relations strategies at a time of negative publicity over apparent conflicts of interest among board members.
Under the deal worked out with Rubenstein, the PR firm received $10,000 for its advice on CIRM’s behalf. However the agreement is technically with Remcho. The letter of agreement with Remcho says, “As part of our services, Rubenstein will provide Remcho, Johansen & Purcell with strategic public relations advice and guidance relative to general corporate matters affecting the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine… Rubenstein’s work on this matter will be considered part of your work product and will be governed, to the extent permitted by law, by attorney/client privilege.” But the letter makes clear who is paying for the advice. It’s taxpayer dollars.
Arrogance, thy name is CIRM.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
