In his Anchor Bible commentary on Revelation, Craig Koester says this about John’s initial vision of Jesus: “The figure’s appearance defies easy description: hair that is white like wool or snow, eyes like a flame of fire, a voice like rushing water, a face like the sun. The comparisons show that what John describes does not fit within the confines of ordinary speech. He uses analogies from human experience to depict something from a different realm” (249).
I confess I do not know what this means. Are similes beyond the “confines of ordinary speech”? Don’t we use analogies all the time, whether we’re speaking of God or of the shape of a cloud or the taste of a wine? We use analogies from human experience to describe what’s in our own realm.
It’s admittedly unusual to see someone with eyes like fire and a face shining like the sun. It’s not so unusual to see someone with snowy-wooly hair. Pretty common, I’d say. And I know a few people whose voices approach the volume of a waterfall.
Jesus is certainly more than language captures, but so is everything else. The vision of Jesus is certainly overwhelming, but John’s language is perfectly ordinary. And no wonder: Language exists so that human beings can speak of and to our Creator. Human language exists for God-talk.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…