Has American popular culture hit a dead end—-essentially stopped evolving and contented itself with endlessly regurgitating the past? That’s the premise of a rather provocative essay in the January issue of Vanity Fair which speculates that, rather than having reached the teleological end of history, we have instead reached an ‘end of culture’:
it was exactly 20 years ago that Francis Fukuyama published The End of History , his influential post-Cold War argument that liberal democracy had triumphed and become the undisputed evolutionary end point toward which every national system was inexorably moving: fundamental political ferment was over and done. Maybe yes, maybe no. But in the arts and entertainment and style realms, this bizarre Groundhog Day stasis of the last 20 years or so certainly feels like an end of cultural history.
Unfortunately for its sweeping thesis, the essay is rather short (far shorter than it could be, and perhaps should be) so it only hints at the deeper significance of this plateau:
rather than a temporary cultural glitch, these stagnant last couple of decades may be a secular rather than cyclical trend, the beginning of American civilization’s new chronic condition, a permanent loss of appetite for innovation and the shockingly new.
Most provocative, perhaps, are the final lines of the piece, with allusions to decline narratives and “The Hollow Men”—-the sort of doomsaying one usually finds in a certain kind of reactionary. It’s interesting that one species of this sentiment has now become sufficiently mainstream as to appear in a magazine like Vanity Fair , even if the lament is more focused on the relative stagnation of bubblegum pop, casual clothing trends, and chain stores than it is on symphonies, formal wear, and classical education.
It’s also notable that the author omits any suggestions for restarting this supposedly-stalled culture. Perhaps the editorial rigors of a word count would not permit it. Or perhaps, with virtually all taboos broken and transgressions made, he simply can’t think of any—-older pillars like family, community, and religion being apparently unmentionable or unremembered.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…