Commenting on the “models” that Dostoevsky used for Stavrogin, Girard says “Knowledge of oneself is perpetually mediated by knowledge of others. The distinction between the ‘autobiographical’ characters and those that are not is thus superficial; it grasps only the superficial works, those that succeed neither in revealing the preexisting mediations between the Other and the Self nor in making themselves the vehicle of new mediations. If the work is profound, one can no more speak of ‘autobiography’ than of ‘invention’ or ‘imagination’ in the usual sense of these terms.”
Letters
Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…