
Can you blame them? The housing association where the Swiss assisted suicide organization Dignitas maintains a death apartment, has evicted the group because other residents are sick of the suicide parade.
It is a familiar sight for the residents of Zurich’s Getrud Strasse number 84. Three or four times a week, during office hours, an ambulance pulls up in front of the unassuming dirty grey housing block. A body is carried out of the building in a charcoal-coloured sack. Often the tenants meet it propped up vertically in the lift on the way down, or in the narrow corridor, before it is placed in the vehicle and driven away.
What a surrealistic scene—perhaps even more than Kevorkian helping extinguish people in his rusty van.
Yet as awful as that depiction is, the reaction of one of the tenents is, to me, even more disturbing:
Gloria Sonny, 55, who has lived in the building for six years – or, as she calls it, “under the same roof as death”—headed a petition calling for Dignitas to go. “I’m not against assisted suicide,” she said, “but this is a place where people live. It’s the wrong place to help people die. I don’t see why I should pay with the quality of my life because Switzerland deals with the topic in a more liberal way than other countries.”
She said the building smelt of death and that she suffered nightmares that she would be forced into one of the “death flats” against her will and made to drink a fatal cocktail.
How twisted we have become: Sure, go ahead and help kill them, just don’t make me have to look. For someone my age, who remembers society’s once unequivocal support for
suicide prevention rather than facilitation, this whole story is almost unimaginable. But the times they are a changing, as Dylan had it, and not necessarily for the better. Unless we reject the terminal nonjudmentalism—illustrated so vividly by Ms. Sonny—that is increasingly permeating society, one day cities might begin issuing zoning permits for euthanasia clinics—think E.G. Robinson going “home” in Soylent Green. After all, it isn’t the killing that is wrong: It is the poor aesthetics.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…