Reflecting on Simmons’s stimulating article on Malvolio: He points out that by the 1590s, Sabbatarianism had become what Christopher Hill characterized as a shibboleth of Puritanism. Yet, at the time of Shakespeare’s play, Puritanism had also become popularly associated with hostility to jollity and festivity.
Make all necessary allowances for the distortions of popular opinion and for the genuine evils of Elizabethan entertainments, and yet one is struck by the fact that a movement know for Sabbath observance could be characterized as joyless.
Shakespeare captures the contradiction neatly, with a reference that associates the blackness of Egypt with the dark house of Malvolio. Shakespeare depicts the “Puritan” as a Pharaoh who places a heavy yoke on the underlings of the house – in the name of Sabbath.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
A Catholic Approach to Immigration
In the USCCB’s recent Special Pastoral Message, the bishops of the United States highlight the suffering inflicted…
The Classroom Heals the Wounds of Generations
“Hope,” wrote the German-American polymath Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, “is the deity of youth.” Wholly dependent on adults, children…
Still Life, Still Sacred
Renaissance painters would use life-sized wooden dolls called manichini to study how drapery folds on the human…
