I wasn’t going to opine about Governor Sarah Palin’s speech, but I think one comment deserves highlighting: Having given birth to Trig, who has Down syndrome, Palin said:
Sometimes even the greatest joys bring challenge. And children with special needs inspire a special love.
To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming place for your sons and daughters. I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House.
This is a profoundly important human exceptionalism issue that I think all political persuasions can get behind, and indeed, it is one that Senator Obama would be wise to embrace in his own campaign.
The need for vocal support for the worth of such children—and explicit and implicit validation of the choice to allow them to be born—from the highest levels of society could not be more important. As we have noted before here at SHS, in support of S-1810, a very worthy bill co-sponsored by Senators Ted Kennedy and Sam Brownback—stranger political bedfellows there never were—to ensure that prospective parents of such children receive accurate information about special needs children:
Eugenic abortion is a growing problem in my view, with about 90 percent of gestating infants with Down syndrome, dwarfism, or spina bifida aborted rather than carried to term. The rush to withhold or withdraw medical treatment for newborns with serious disabilities is also a rising risk. The bill will not prohibit eugenic abortion or withdrawing treatment, but if passed it will require that parents receive full and accurate information—not just the negative—about raising children with such conditions in the belief that fewer parents who are fully informed will opt for abortion or withdrawing treatment.
If Ted Kennedy and Sam Brownback can join together in this worthy effort, so too can Barack Obama/Joe Biden and John McCain/Sarah Palin. In that event, whoever loses the election, special needs kids will win.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…