We have discussed here whether anyone is “pro abortion.” I think some are, and some not. But in NYC, it is clear that far too many women are indifferent to it. Otherwise, what explains a 39% rate of induced abortions in that city? From the story:
In 2009, there were 225,667 pregnancies in the City with 126,774 resulting in live births and 87,273 resulting in abortions. In addition to those abortion numbers, there were 11,620 spontaneous terminations. Forty-six percent of all births in the Bronx result in abortions—the highest among the five boroughs, according to the report. Blacks had the highest number of abortions with 40,798 with Hispanics having the second highest at 28,364, according to the report. In response, the Chiaroscuro Foundation, a non-profit organization that supports alternatives to abortion, pledged that it will spend $1 million in 2011 to address the City’s abortion rate—nearly double the national average of 23 percent.
There is no excuse for this. Abortion is not a morally neutral act, it stops a beating heart, as the old pro life advocacy slogan has it. And such a hedonistic indifference to the reality of destroying a gestating human being impacts the morality of society overall by subverting the perceived importance of human life and the duty to properly control one’s behavior and its consequences. In other words, I think it is our business.
I also believe that the ready availability of abortion has led to less sexual responsibility in the USA. I mean, it isn’t as if it is difficult to obtain condoms in NYC. Birth control is affordable and readily available. Good grief, any Catholic church can direct a couple to natural family planning that can effectively prevent pregnancy via temporary abstinence—and I am sure they would do so gratis. Are we that beyond self control we can’t take small steps to be responsible for our own sexuality?
If smokers can be subjected to peer pressure to abstain, why can’t the same be applied to reduce the abortion rate? We don’t have to be neutral. As a society, I think we should promote the choice of first, not getting pregnant unless you want to, and if that fails, birth. And pro-choicers, I think, have the greater obligation to speak out and take steps: After all, they are the ones who claim to want abortion to be safe, legal, and rare.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
