A Specter That Foretells … Nothing At All

Much, too much perhaps, is being made of Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter’s move from the Republican Party to the Democrat Party.

There is a lot to be said of it, of course, but it is probably best to let Specter speak for himself. A month ago he told the Philadelphia Inquirer , “To eliminate any doubt, I am a Republican, and I am running for reelection in 2010 as a Republican on the Republican ticket.” That was then, this is now. Yesterday he told CNN, he had “surveyed the sentiments of the Republican Party in Pennsylvania and public opinion polls . . . and have found that the prospects for winning a Republican primary are bleak.” That means bleaker than in 2004 when he won the primary with only fifty-one percent of the vote.

Watching his Republican primary poll numbers go south in potential match-ups with possible GOP opponents can be said to concentrate the political mind wonderfully. His poll numbers with GOP voters have been hovering around twenty-one percent. Being the only Republican senator to vote for the Obama administration’s bailout, hugely unpopular with Pennsylvania Republicans, singled him out as a marked man. Unwilling to let his twenty-nine years in the Senate undergo electoral scrutiny in a Republican primary, he has wisely decided that Democratic primary voters might be counted upon to render a judgment more to his liking.

Fair enough. As a past Speaker of the House, Tip O’Neill, once put it, “All politics is local.” The short story is: What it is is getting re-elected. I see very little else to it.

But that is not the story going around. The story line for Specter comes out something like “mean old GOP right wing drives out warm-hearted Republican moderate.” The sidebar says, “this spells doom for Republican Party as a national force.”

Oh, pish. There was no similar trope for Democrats when Senator Joe Liberman lost the 2006 Democratic primary. His support for the Iraq war was his undoing among liberal Democrats. He declared himself independent and successfully mounted a third-party reelection campaign in Connecticut, defeating both the Republican nominee and the official Democratic nominee.

The Republicans have a lot of party building to do, no doubt. So did the Democrats in 1994 when Republicans swept the House.  There’s just not much new under the sun.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…