Yesterday I made some comments on Google’s doodle that commemorated the fiftieth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Sometimes I react before I finish reflecting. Some of the comments (along with some conversation with personal friends) caused me to rethink what I’d written. I’d like to retract some of what I said.
I still think that the doodle creates an intentional ambiguity in which the viewer is reminded of both MLK and Barack Obama at the same time. The doodle is definitely of MLK. He’s even got his hand raised just as he does in the most iconic photo from the event. But those ears. Those ears do not look anything like MLK’s, though they strongly resemble Obama’s. The key for me is that we don’t see his face. Why would Google take the iconic photo of King and spin it around to the back so as to obscure his features?
In my original post I suggest that Google uses the doodle to communicate that we’re still more or less in the same place we were in 1963. I now think that was a wrong interpretation. My own cynicism about America’s political discourse, coupled with the recent tensions over the Zimmerman case, led me astray.
I think Google was attempting something much more positive with its doodle. When we see it, we are reminded of King in 1963, but when we blink, we’re reminded that Obama will be addressing America from the same spot in 2013. A black leader argues for equality, and fifty years later a black president honors his memory. Part of the dream has been fulfilled. There is a beautiful symmetry to the moment, and I think Google’s ambiguity about the face highlighted this.
I was even encouraged by the first half of Obama’s speech. In it he addressed the concern that I voiced in my previous post. I was concerned about people dishonoring King by belittling how far we’ve come. Obama agrees.
To dismiss the magnitude of this process, to suggest, as some sometimes do that little has changed, that dishonors the courage and the sacrifice of those who paid the price to march in those years. Medgar Evers, James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, Martin Luther King, Jr. — they did not die in vain. Their victory was great.
I’m going to set aside my cynicism for a day or two. I think Google, Obama, and I are all on the same page regarding this one point: America has come a long way. The doodle is a kind of a cool prophecy/fulfillment confluence. A leader of black Americans announces his dream, and exactly fifty years later a black leader of all Americans reminds us how much we’ve gained.
I ended my last post by saying, “Some people will feel that I’m reading too much into a doodle. Maybe I am.” I probably shouldn’t retract that statement.
You can see the doodle and read the original post here .
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…