A gentleman can be trusted with power, but a cad cannot be trusted even when he appears powerless. It is an essential attribute of American conservatives that often telling a gentleman from a cad is hard.
Some men start as gentlemen, but become cads. Some (thank God) of us start as cads, but become gentlemen.
As a result we don’t trust too much power being given to anybody without maximum transparency.
Why? People in power are not worse than people out of power, but they have more ability to do harm.
Here is an easy observation to make: the more secret me can be in their actions, the worse those actions can become before being checked.
War is to be feared by an conservative, because it empowers government. The power tends to stick around when the emergency ends. That is dangerous.
Secret powers are even more dangerous. Some are probably necessary, but they should be kept to a minimum. Spy agencies need all the oversight they can get, but by nature they will always be sore spots in the Republic open to abuse by their very nature.
Giving secretive agencies the power to torture is even more dangerous. Even if we assume that the power will at first be used for “good” causes, no conservative will be sanguine about the future. We assume such great power will corrupt . . . and corrupt an agency badly.
Oversight of such “torture” will almost always come after the fact in the cases where torture is most justifiable (“LA is about to be bombed!”). To preserve the secrecy of the agency it will be done by groups of insiders, often with a vested interest in maintaining the establishment.
As a conservative, there is no establishment I trust with this power.
Mostly war is declared and fought openly. Many of us will be able to pass judgment on our leaders. Of course, some actions in war will be clandestine, but these are very, very dangerous for us.
Those actions that are not “open” must be heavily limited, because of the chances for abuse. If torture is outlawed, then at least we will have reason to hope that the bad actions of secret agencies will be deterred. If someone does snap and torture a prisoner, members of the establishment will be empowered to condemn then without undermining the entire system.
This makes it more likely that bad actors will be punished.
After all, we don’t want to win the war, but discover we have created a government establishment that makes our victory hollow or reduces our liberties.
Torture is immoral, but there are good political reasons for a conservative to oppose it.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
