One Body Through the Cross, the Princeton Proposal for Christianity Unity, criticizes the ecumenical movement for “liberal indifference” to orthodoxy, which has sometimes provoked a reaction of “divisive sectarianism.”
For some, the solution is to stress traditional doctrinal formulations, but this cure is part of the disease. As Margaret O’Gara explains in her contribution to Receptive Ecumenism: “Wanting to avoid an indifferent relativism, some churches focus on older formulations to define their identity over against other churches. But, in fact, the Princeton Proposal argues, both liberal indifference and divisive sectarianism are often marked by a shift away from the question of truth and towards the question of identity: ‘The question Is it true?, that is, faithful to the divine revelation, was implicitly equated with Is it authentically Catholic?, Is it Evangelical?, Does it express the mind of Orthodoxy?, Is it congruent with the dynamics of the Reformation? ’ (§ 41). The Proposal continues, ‘This shift from truth to identity reflects a kind of tribalization of Christian communities’ which can play into the hands of secular nationalism, ethnic conflict, or consumerist dynamics (§ 42).”
Liberalism and sectarianism are, in short, two versions of tribalism.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…