isn’t necessarily the Chief Justice John Roberts-written opinion – or rather it is necessarily going to be the Roberts-written opinion for very long. In his majority opinion, Roberts wrote that the interstate commerce clause does not give Congress the power to mandate that individuals purchase a particular class of product. Some are taking that as good news. Fine. I’ll take what I can get.
But Justice Ginsburg wrote a concurrence joined by the other three liberal Justices that upholds the mandate on commerce clause grounds. That includes the two Justices appointed by President Obama. To the extent that this ruling makes it more likely that President will be elected to a second term, it becomes that much more likely that one of the five non-liberal Justices (and two of them are in their mid-seventies) will be replaced by a liberal Justice. In that case, with a liberal majority on the Court, the Ginsburg concurrence will, in practice, become the majority opinion if a similar case comes up. The “good news” might be short-lived.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…