It is amazing that in their zeal to validate Obamacare, the Supreme Court majority gave the government relief for which it didn’t ask! From the ruling:
In making its Commerce Clause argument, the Government defended the mandate as a regulation requiring individuals to purchase health insurance. The Government does not claim that the taxing power allows Congress to issue such a command. Instead, the Government asks us to read the mandate not as ordering individuals to buy insurance, but rather as imposing a tax on those who do not buy that product.
So, legislation was passed on one basis, which would lead to reversal, but later defended on a completely contradictory basis—as demonstrated by the legislative history. But the Court shrugs and says okay, whatever it takes to keep it. That is what is known as judicial legislating.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…