Sonic community

Ong again: He notes that some critters (ants, fish) have a social organization of sorts without sound, but argues that for animals that emit sounds, sound signals establish social relations. This is due to the reciprocal character of sound: “Sounds which I produce tend to evoke responses from outside me in a way that very few of my visible or tangible activities do.”

Further, sounds are typically used within a group, forming a sonic community: “animal sound almost always is a signal to others within the species . . . Normally lions roar not to frighten their prey or even other competing carnivores but to signal to other lions [which is why Jesus roars like a lion, and Satan!].” By contrast, “visual and olfactory as well as tactual signals are regularly used to affect other species; for example, to frighten or discourage predators.”

Touch is also reciprocal (the touched is necessarily also touching), but touch requires proximity, and “socialization commonly demands a certain distance” that sound allows.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…

The trouble with blogging …

Joseph Bottum

The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…