Politics For The Greatest Good:
The Case for Prudence in the Public Square
by Clarke D. Forsythe
IVP Books, 304 pages, $23 paper
n
Clarke D. Forsythe, senior counsel for Americans for Life, has written an essential book for lawmakers and all participants in the ongoing culture wars, particularly those engaging in public-policy issues concerning the origins of life, the end of life, and marriage. He explains, “I wrote this book to address the nagging concern that citizens and political officials sometimes have whether it’s moral or effective to achieve a partial good in politics and public policy when the ideal is not possible.” His answer is a resounding yes.
Forsyth provides a masterly discussion of prudence, that virtue that governs and guides the other cardinal virtues of justice, fortitude, and temperance. Along the way, he demonstrates how prudence has been defined and applied throughout history. Simply put, prudence means making good decisions and implementing them effectively, or, in Aquinas’ definition, “right reason about what is to be done.” Forsythe successfully shows his readers that “there is no moral compromise when we make the aims of politics not the perfect good but the greatest good possible.”
Forsythe reviews the thought on the classical virtue of prudence, “against the backdrop of the thought of Greek, Roman, and Stoic philosophers like Aristotle, Seneca, Cicero, Augustine, and Thomas Aquinas.” He then studies the practical political application of prudence in the founding of the American republic and the divergent approaches of William Wilberforce and Abraham Lincoln to ending slavery. Forsythe also examines prudence in relation to the moral watershed of our time, legalized abortion, and finishes with a chapter on “Regulating Biotechnology to Protect Human Life and Human Goods.”
Our revulsion against the moral horrors of our age can incline us to reject anything less than complete and immediate reversal of Roe v. Wade and other repellent aspects of the current social order. But prudence helps us to perceive and judge gradations of good and evil, guiding our adoption of the most productive strategies to promote the good and amend the bad. Forsythe reminds us that at times the best is the enemy of the good.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
Why the Death Penalty Is a Sore Point for Papal Authority
Pope Leo XIV marked World Day Against the Death Penalty, observed on October 10, with the following…
The Myth of St. Francis
At the beginning of his 2020 encyclical, Fratelli Tutti, Pope Francis speaks of “an episode in the…
Job and Her
It is said that Job lost everything, but she has lost more. All her possessions—the money, the…