James Carroll’s account of Constantine ( Constantine’s Sword ) is riddled with half-truths and distortions. He’s not nearly as bad as Dan Brown, but he’s bad.
But the howler (thus far) is this: Christians had tried to work out how Jesus is God without coming to a consensus, but what had “eluded . . . finely tuned, passionate minds as variously engaged with the question as Irenaeus, Origen, and Arius – would now be imposed by imperial fiat. Unity would henceforth be the note not only of the political order but of a revealed truth. With holiness and catholicity, ‘unity’ would henceforth be, in the argot, a ‘mark’ of the Church – at least in theory.”
“Henceforth”? Carroll used to be a Roman Catholic priest: Surely, at some point in that earlier career he stumbled across John 17 or Ephesians 2-4 or Paul’s regular exhortations to “be of one mind.”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
A Catholic Approach to Immigration
In the USCCB’s recent Special Pastoral Message, the bishops of the United States highlight the suffering inflicted…
The Classroom Heals the Wounds of Generations
“Hope,” wrote the German-American polymath Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, “is the deity of youth.” Wholly dependent on adults, children…
Still Life, Still Sacred
Renaissance painters would use life-sized wooden dolls called manichini to study how drapery folds on the human…
