It’s a strange hermeneutical theory that doesn’t want to deal with words, but that’s the way many modern hermeneutical systems (beginning with Schleiermacher) work: The interpreter is trying to slip past the veil of language to the mind behind. Inky words on rag-and-wood-pulp pages are just too physical to communicate ethereal consciousness.
Lundin suggests that Hirsch and others would want to revise John 1:1: “In the beginning was the Mind, and the Mind was with God, and the Mind was God.”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Visiting an Armenian Archbishop in Prison
On February 3, I stood in a poorly lit meeting room in the National Security Services building…
Christians Are Reclaiming Marriage to Protect Children
Gay marriage did not merely redefine an institution. It created child victims. After ten years, a coalition…
Save the Fox, Kill the Fetus
Question: Why do babies in the womb have fewer rights than vermin? Answer: Because men can buy…
