Why would Barr, Saussure, and others think that speakers and writers have only the present meaning of a word in mind? Does it perhaps have something to do with the fact that they have only the present sense in mind?
As the previous post showed, this is hardly a universal prejudice. The decline of interest in etymology is fairly recent (cf. Yakov Malkiel’s Etymology for a history of 19th and 20th centuries).
Have we all perhaps been trained to ignore word origins and historical meanings? Just because we’ve been trained in this ahistorical frame of mind, why would we think that the minds of ancients, medievals, or biblical writers ran along the same tracks?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Natural Law Needs Revelation
Natural law theory teaches that God embedded a teleological moral order in the world, such that things…
Letters
Glenn C. Loury makes several points with which I can’t possibly disagree (“Tucker and the Right,” January…
Visiting an Armenian Archbishop in Prison
On February 3, I stood in a poorly lit meeting room in the National Security Services building…
