An adult chimp has killed a baby chimp at the LA Zoo. From the story:
The first chimpanzee baby born at the LA Zoo in 13 years was mauled to death Tuesday by an adult chimp in front of a crowd of visitors, including children, zoo officials said.
Did the baby chimp have a “right to life?” Ridiculous. Did the killing chimp violate the infant’s rights? Nonsensical, on its face. Was the chimp evil for exposing the human children to such violence? I can’t imagine anyone so thinking.
Yet, they are supposedly “persons.” But morality and adherence to duties are not part of chimp nature, despite their relatively high intelligence. Not true of us: Moral agency is an inherent part of being human.
That is why if I had commited the chimpicide, it would create an outcry of righteous moral outrage. I have human duties—again, there is no such thing as chimp duties—for which I can be held to account. That is a distinction with a moral difference.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…