Arians use the words of Scripture, Athanasius acknowledges, but they use them only as a cloak and disguise to deceive and seduce. They are like the devil their father, who used Scriptural language to tempt Eve and attempted to tempt Jesus by quoting Scripture.
What’s the difference between faithful use of Scriptural words and deceitful use of Scriptural words? For Athanasius, the difference lies in the character of the speaker. Arians don’t mean what they say because they don’t speak “from an upright mind.” Had they expounded the Christian faith with appeals to the orthodox fathers, their use of Scripture would be taken seriously, since the “character of the men is sincere and incapable of fraud.”
Behind this characterization of Arians is an implicit theory of language, one that locates meaning not in words (only) but in the character of the person speaking. ”Is it true?” is a question not only for the proposition but for the proposer.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
