Abstraction and Atonement Theory

Atonement theories abound. Christus Victor says Jesus triumphed over Satan; sacrificial theories say that Jesus offered Himself as a vicarious sacrifice; recently, a number of theologians have emphasized the corporate, ecclesial dimensions of the atonement.

All true. We don’t need to choose among them.

Revelation 12:11 makes that plain: “They overcame [the dragon] because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their witness.”

It’s all there: Victory over Satan (“overcame” the dragon); sacrifice (“blood of the Lamb”); and, very strongly, ecclesial participation in the atonement (“they overcame” the dragon “because of the word of their witness”).

Any single theory abstracts from this knotted complex of themes. Abstraction is an important heuristic trick, but if the abstracted isn’t reintegrated, then it can only distort. 

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Lift My Chin, Lord 

Jennifer Reeser

Lift my chin, Lord,Say to me,“You are not whoYou feared to be,Not Hecate, quite,With howling sound,Torch held…

Letters

Two delightful essays in the March issue, by Nikolas Prassas (“Large Language Poetry,” March 2025) and Gary…

Spring Twilight After Penance 

Sally Thomas

Let’s say you’ve just comeFrom confession. Late sunPours through the budding treesThat mark the brown creek washing Itself…