Atonement theories abound. Christus Victor says Jesus triumphed over Satan; sacrificial theories say that Jesus offered Himself as a vicarious sacrifice; recently, a number of theologians have emphasized the corporate, ecclesial dimensions of the atonement.
All true. We don’t need to choose among them.
Revelation 12:11 makes that plain: “They overcame [the dragon] because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their witness.”
It’s all there: Victory over Satan (“overcame” the dragon); sacrifice (“blood of the Lamb”); and, very strongly, ecclesial participation in the atonement (“they overcame” the dragon “because of the word of their witness”).
Any single theory abstracts from this knotted complex of themes. Abstraction is an important heuristic trick, but if the abstracted isn’t reintegrated, then it can only distort.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
