You Gotta Have Hart. But All You Really Need is the New INTERCOLLEGIATE REVIEW

The new INTERCOLLEGIATE REVIEW is out in a classy online edition! It has all kinds of good stuff, including Darwinian Larry’s clearest statement yet on the difference between DARWINIAN CONSERVATISM and METAPHYSICAL CONSERVATISM. It also includes a review by ME on the D.B. Hart’s wonderfully erudite polemic against atheists old and new. There’s a lot to learn from Hart, although I think he goes too far. Here’s an except from ME:

Every feature of the personal liberation praised by our new atheists and our egalitarian autonomy boosters generally cameinto the world in Christian communities. Even the Stoics didn’t approach theChristians in their indifference to a person’s social status. The Christians were the first to be completely opposed to slavery;the first for raising women to equality in marriage and elsewhere; the first for faithfulness in monogamous marriage; the first for the egalitarian brotherhood of all men. For the Christians, the community of personal love wasn’t some otherworldly hope. Rather, that community was formed by obligations given to divinized beings here and now. Our divinization through Christ includes what is called life after death, but we can live lovingly liberated from death even before we die.

A big difference between Hart and Nietzsche, it should go without saying, is
that Hart doesn’t hate the modern world insofar as it is a Christian accomplishment.
(And every partisan of “Enlightenment rationalism” who buys Jefferson on “monkish ignorance and superstitution” and clerical tyranny as the effectual truth of Christianity needs to read this book.)

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Deliver Us from Evil

Kari Jenson Gold

In a recent New York Times article entitled “Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery…

Natural Law Needs Revelation

Peter J. Leithart

Natural law theory teaches that God embedded a teleological moral order in the world, such that things…

Letters

Glenn C. Loury makes several points with which I can’t possibly disagree (“Tucker and the Right,” January…