Xenophobia Against the Obese

This story is unbelievable. New Zealand is refusing to let a woman emigrate from the UK to be with her husband because she is too fat. Wouldn’t want to let someone in who might cost the nationalized health care system too much money, don’t you know. From the story:

Robyn Toomath, a spokesman for Fight the Obesity Epidemic and an endocrinologist, said the BMI limit was valid in the vast majority of people. She said she was opposed to obese people being stigmatised.

“However, the immigration department’s focus is different,” she said. “It cannot afford to import people into the country who are going to be a significant drain on our health resources. “You can see the logic in assessing if there is a significant health cost associated with this individual and that would be a reason for them not coming in.”

Before anyone says, good, you had better be ready to go after all conduct and life circumstances that could cost health care money: How about people who sleep around? Ah, no question that they can be a drain on health care resources: The promiscuous have greater chances of STDs, HIV, unwanted pregnancy and abortion. But then, unlike looking down our noses at the obese, it is politically incorrect to judge people as wrong for having too much sex. Nope. The promiscuous get a pass.

Smokers? Well, that goes without saying, doesn’t it? But it is actually a tougher call than it appears. I mean, look at all the taxes they pay on cigarettes! We wouldn’t want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs, now would we?

People with disabilities? They wouldn’t dare. Unlike the obese, people with disabilities have political clout.

See what happens once this kind of thing begins? It’s like the high school clique thing: Only those with unpopular unhealthy conditions will be punished.

Oh yes, did you hear? In the UK they want to prevent obese women from gaining access to IVF.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…