I don’t watch a lot of television (yes, I’m a BAD PUNDIT), so I didn’t see the Wolf Blitzer-Ron Paul moment live. And I’m not a big fan of Ron Paul (which means that there’s a pretty good chance that some folks will criticize me just for that).
But here I kinda sorta agree with Ron Paul: it isn’t—or at least isn’t always— government’s job to clean up the messes we make when we’re irresponsible. If I as an individual see a person in serious need, and I have to resources to help him or her, I may be called to do so, but I am most emphatically not called as a matter of universal principle to create and support a government program to help everyone similarly situated. I can quite reasonably worry in these cases about the effects of government action on the character of those who are compelled to give and on the character of those who expect as a matter of course to receive. And I can always ask questions about the effectiveness of government programs.
I won’t always rule out a government program. But the fact that I have a Christian duty to care for, say, widows and orphans doesn’t require that I support any old government program that does that.
So these Liberty University students may or may not be saying that because it’s un-Christian to let an uninsured comatose patient die, it necessarily follows that it’s appropriate for government always to step in, let alone essentially assume effective control of our healthcare system.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…