What was said by ME at Georgetown

So I just got in the mail the impressive newsletter from Pat Deneen’s Tocqueville Forum at Georgetown. Here’s its prosaic but kind of pithy summary of what I said there on Constitution Day:

Dr. Peter Lawler argued that Locke’s ideas fit the Mystery Passage [ Planned Parenthood v. Casey ] definition of liberty. He pointed out that the Founders, whose diverse persuasions varied from Lockeanism to Calvinism “built better than they knew” through legislative compromise. This compromise appeared as an “accidental Thomism” which broke down, however, because Supreme Court judicial activism replaced legislative compromise in the states.

The other speakers sort of disagreed. “Dr. [Richard] Hassing said . . . ’it is impossible to find a seed of something as radical as the Mystery Clause in the American Founding’; the Founders were influenced by the premodern notion that man has an end prior to his choices.”

I, of course, did not deny that influence, but it didn’t come from Locke’s radicalism.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…

The trouble with blogging …

Joseph Bottum

The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…