Weather Is Not Climate (But You Knew That, Right?)

Several years ago it was mildly amusing when people would joke about heavy snowfall refuting global warming. Now the bit is just stale—and I’m starting to wonder if people really believe there is a direct connection between individual storms and changing climate patterns. For those who are unclear on the concept, Roger Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, explains :

What happens in the weather this week or next tells us absolutely nothing about the role of humans in influencing the climate system. It is unjustifiable to claim that a cold snap or heavy snow disproves or even casts doubts predictions of long-term climate change. It is equally unjustifiable to say that a cold snap or heavy snow in any way offers empirical support for predictions of long-term climate change. This goes for all weather events.

Further, it is professionally irresponsible for scientists to claim that some observed weather is “consistent with” long-term predictions of climate change. Any and all weather fits this criteria. Similarly, any and all weather is also “consistent with” failing predictions of long-term climate change. The “consistent with” canard is purposely misleading.

Knowledge of climate requires long-term records — on the time scale of a decade and longer. Don’t look to the weather to learn about climate, unless you have a long time to watch. Using the weather to score cheap political points in the climate debate appears to be a tactical area of agreement among those who otherwise disagree about climate change.

(Via: The Volokh Conspiracy )