Bioethics ideology is generally relativist and roughly utilitarian. “Choice” is the keyword for “persons,” e.g., those with sufficient cognitive capacity to possess what the rest of us call human rights. (Persons can be non humans in this thinking.) If one is not a person, however, they may not have the right to life or even, to bodily integrity. Recall my debate with biothicist Bill Allen when he said Michael Schiavo should have been able to consent to Terri’s organs being harvested before she was actually dead.
A few bioethicists are so smitten by autonomy, that they are now promoting the notion that people obsessed with becoming amputees should be able to have healthy limbs cut off and willing physicians should be able to do it. This is not the mainstream view—yet. But given the nearly anything goes tide that sweeps bioethics discourse forward, it may only be a matter of time.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
