With the Michael Vick guilty plea, I updated my earlier column on how his dog fighting activities violated our human duty to treat animals humanely for the San Francisco Chronicle. It is a little stronger on the human exceptionalism than the former column, and all in all I think, a somewhat better piece.
But this fascinates me: Every time I bring up human exceptionalism, some people get into high dudgeon—insisting that we are not special. I am not sure why these folk seem so attached to human unexcetionalism. But if being human isn’t what gives us the moral obligation to treat animals (and the environment) properly, I don’t know what does.
Of Roots and Adventures
I have lived in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia (twice), Pennsylvania, Alabama (also twice), England, and Idaho. I left…
Our Most Popular Articles of 2025
It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…
Our Year in Film & Television—2025
First Things editors and writers share the most memorable films and TV shows they watched this year.…