James Jordan points to structural links between the death of the innocents at hands of Herod (Matt 2) death of innocent Jesus at hands of Romans (Matt 27). While Jesus escapes the first slaughter by fleeing to Egypt, he enters the “Egypt” of Jerusalem/Judea to suffer the slaughter.
There is an inversion of the logic of Passover at work here. The original logic was that the Egyptians who killed the firstborn of Israel would themselves lose their firstborn. In Matthew, “Pharaoh” Herod slaughters infants but does not lose his firstborn. Instead, Jesus, the firstborn of the Father, is killed in a greater Passover. Herod strikes out at the infant King, and instead of receiving retaliation, another king, Pilate, gets a second change to strike, and succeeds.
Herod strikes on one cheek; Jesus turns His cheek so Pilate can strike the other.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Rome and the Church in the United States
Archbishop Michael J. Curley of Baltimore, who confirmed my father, was a pugnacious Irishman with a taste…
Marriage Annulment and False Mercy
Pope Leo XIV recently told participants in a juridical-pastoral formation course of the Roman Rota that the…
Undercover in Canada’s Lawless Abortion Industry
On November 27, 2023, thirty-six-year-old Alissa Golob walked through the doors of the Cabbagetown Women’s Clinic in…
