Gracia’s entry is very good – a clearly written, thorough, stimulating summary of philosophical and literary debates about the meaning of meaning.
He ends with the claim that theology “establishes not only textual meaning, but also the degree to which other factors play roles in the proper interpretation of Scriptures.” It “contains not only interpretations of the world, but also rules that determine the legitimate meaning of the texts regarded as revealed.” He points to different interpretations of Genesis 1, which differ according to the theology assumed by the interpreter.
A couple of notes: Obviously, this places us in a hermeneutical circle, in that Protestants seek to derive theology from Scripture. Plus, I’m not sure that theology is as determinative for interpretations of Genesis 1 as he says; there are Christians who interpret Genesis 1 literally with being “committed theologically to the literal interpretation of Scriptures.” Finally, it seems that he has slightly switched the topic of discussion. Theology, he says, establishes textual meaning, but then his example has to do with the interpretation of the text. But he’s already gone some way to distinguish between establishing meanings and interpreting texts.
Paul Ehrlich, False Prophet
Paul Ehrlich, noted author of The Population Bomb, died last week. Few people have been so consequentially…
Restoring Man at Notre Dame
It is fascinating to be an outsider on the inside of an institution going through times of…
Deliver Us from Evil
In a recent New York Times article entitled “Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery…