New York Post film critic Kyle Smith lists the ” Five Most Idiotic Oscar Nominations of the Year ” and references one of my favorite books in his savagely spot-on take of the most disappointing movie of the year:
Best Picture for “The Hurt Locker.” C’mon people: This movie is one great scene (which is essentially repeated three times, just to be sure we caught it) and a shapeless second hour. We get it: War is a drug. Four words do not a story constitute, let alone a great story, let alone a great movie. This movie reminds me of Tom Wolfe’s comment, in “The Painted Word,” that a postmodernist painting like something by Jasper Johns was essentially a rebus leading you to a single, simple message.
After hearing months of effusive praise by critics, I was so excited to see The Hurt Locker that I watched it the day it came out on DVD. It was a huge letdown. Contrary to the critic’s claims, it wasn’t particularly riveting, suspenseful, or accomplished. It was a passable, though unenlightening, war movie that didn’t seem to have much fresh to say about either soldiers or combat. The fact that it wasn’t a America-loathing caricature of the Iraq War likely accounts for much of the acclaim and is worthy of applause (or at least a golf clap). But as Smith notes, as a story it was flat and simplistic and as a movie it falls far short of being Oscar-worthy.
Anyone see it have a different take?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
