The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown University recently hosted a panel discussion on how religious liberty figures into the Arab Spring, featuring an array of experts, including a representative from the Pew Forum, a former Bush Administration counsel, and various professors.
The discussion, introduced by Tom Farr (author of several pieces in this magazine), centers around the thesis that repressive regimes paradoxically increase religious bloodshed in the long term, while more democratic societies (particularly ones which permit the expression of religious sentiment in public life) ultimately have fewer incidents of violence and radicalization. It’s a polarizing claim, and it engendered some lively dissension, particularly on the part of Mohammed Hafez, a scholar at the Naval Academy, who attacks that thesis as overly optimistic, wielding example upon example.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…